Innovation Ecosystem Design

Just as no two students are exactly the same, no two teachers and no two schools are the same either. Because of varying experiences, people, and communities, leaders need to adjust their strategies for developing an innovation ecosystem to match the needs of the staff, schools, or districts in which they work.

As a new leader in a new district, my first order of business is developing relationships and learning all I could about my setting. What do people value? Where are people coming from? What are our shared goals? Who are our students? What are our challenges? Luckily, our district has a newly created vision statement which outlines the dispositions our stakeholders value most: self-direction, critical thinking, empathy, and perseverance.

As we work to clarify these dispositions so that we have a common understanding of what the dispositions look like at different grade levels and in different subject areas, teachers must feel empowered to develop these traits in our students and themselves - we cannot wait for consensus. These dispositions represent what students need right now. This development will require risk-taking and reflection which can only be encouraged in an environment of trust.

The use of professional learning communities will grow out of a need for collaboration. Our teachers can help each other examine student work and ask the hard questions about what students actually learned despite what we think we taught. This type of analysis will take us to the next level of self-efficacy, the number one teacher trait required to increase student achievement according to Hattie. In addition to PLCs within our school, teachers can develop their own professional learning networks to support their growth within their specific grade levels or subject areas or needs. Having a trusted, online or in-person community to which you can ask challenging questions and with whom you can share and self-reflect is critical for growth as a professional.

As we work on revising our curriculum, we can focus on building opportunities for students to create rather than consume. And I'm not talking about creating a project or an essay that students hand in to the teacher or present to the class at the end of a unit of study. I'm talking about creating every day. To do so will require us to design authentic tasks for authentic audiences. Blogs, blueprints, videos, art, poetry, and models are just a few ways students can create as they learn.

We will need to design professional development opportunities for teachers that is differentiated, personalized, and strength-based. This learning should address the needs of our students and teachers while also staying clearly focused on moving us closer to our vision. Self-reflection and feedback loops must be a critical part of our ecosystem, providing opportunities for growth for individuals as well as our entire system.

Measuring Innovation

It seems impossible, measuring innovation. And yet we must find a way to show its impact. Proof is powerful when you are trying to convince a community to trust in the unknown, something new that has never been tried at your school or maybe ever. The question becomes: What does that proof look like?

I think we need to be innovative here (pun intended). Before we can decide on which proof we need, we should decide on what we want students to know and be able to do. This is not easy in the complex, connected world in which we now live and for which we need to prepare our students. I like the 4 Cs of 21st Century Learning from P21: collaboration, communication, critical thinking, and creativity. These skills all require innovative thinking in order to be practiced, and they will require educators to be innovative in measuring them. The work is worth it as the 4 Cs are essential to success in an ever-changing economy and society.

For sure, the old A, B, C method will not work. What do these letters mean? What do they tell us about where students are in their development of these critical skills? Standards-based report cards that include various sections such as literacy, mathematics, social skills, and work habits come a little closer as they break larger subject areas down into smaller skills. However, teachers still give students a rating compared to others their age and in their grade level. This only tells parents how close their child is to being like all the others and not how much their child has grown in the given time period since the last report.

What is needed is a new method of capturing growth that includes a student reflection. Given the technology that is available to us now, this new method could take on many shapes and forms. In The Innovator's Mindset, George Couros offers digital portfolios and blogs as a possibility. He makes a strong argument that videos, text, pictures, audio files, Podcasts, slideshows, graphics, and more, all chosen by and reflected upon by the learner gives a true view of learning that is taking place. He also argues that sharing such a portfolio or blog with a larger audience beyond a classroom teacher or even a school provides a learner with authentic feedback. Finally, he suggests that since teachers are also learners, they should be compiling such a portfolio or blog themselves to model the process and gain a better understanding of what they are asking their students to do.

This has inspired me to imagine such a portfolio for myself. Now that I am blogging more, the reflection is happening. How to add work samples to my blog is the next idea to consider for me. Just like looking at student work/creation is key to understanding their learning, looking at my own work will help me connect my ideas with my actions. This is a crucial part of my leadership journey.

"Learning is creation, not consumption." #IMMOOC Blog Post 2

In Part I of The Innovator's Mindset, one idea that really gave me pause for reflection was the quote from The Center for Accelerated Learning on pg. 55, "Learning is creation, not consumption." It made me think of a sixth question to add to the list of Critical Questions for the Innovative Educator:

What evidence of learning do we see in this student's creation?

For several years I have believed in the power of looking at student work in shifting a teacher's focus from what they are doing to what their students are doing. This shift is important because I have known many teachers who think only about what and how they are teaching, how their day is going, how hard they are working, how busy and stressed they are, how frustrating or amazing their students  can be. I have argued that looking at student work is what is needed to deepen PLC conversations and refocus teacher energy on the student experience. After all, it's the student learning that is the purpose of our work.

Now I feel the need to revise my mantra from "looking at student work" to "looking at student creations." In a creation, a teacher would see not just facts or algorithms regurgitated onto a page, instead she would see synthesis, prioritization, and communication about a topic or concept. This tells us so much more about a student's strengths and weaknesses, his "soft skills," his depth of understanding, and his ability to share it with others.

The painting shown above was created by my daughter for her high school art class. I am not an artist myself, but I can appreciate the skill, focus, persistence, planning, and time management that went into this creation, and I bet her teacher can see it too.

The Innovator's Mindset, The Imperative

"...in schools, where we focus on students as the future, growth can no longer be simply an option."

I'm not sure why many teachers resist change so much. Some of them will say they're too busy or they've seen ideas come and go. However if you truly look, step back and observe students in so many of our classrooms today, you will see a problem. That problem is disengagement. Whether teachers believe that students should be better disciplined or respectful because adults tell them to or not, our customers are not buying what we are selling, and if they weren't forced to be in their classrooms by law, many of them would be headed out the door. They don't see the relevance of what we teach, they don't enjoy the process through which we teach them, and they are not inspired by the audience from whom they receive feedback on their work.

When teachers see this disengagement day after day, how can they deny the problem? When more and more students are being placed in intervention groups for reading, math, and social/emotional/behavioral "issues," how can we continue with the status quo? When many students' main goal is to play the game of school so they can get out start their "real" lives, how can teachers refuse to reflect? The change in thinking about school proposed in The Innovator's Mindset and Launch are most definitely NOT change for change's sake. Instead it is change for our future's sake. 

"The question that must be asked every day is, 'What is best for this learner?'"

If teachers would shift their focus from what they are doing to what their students are doing, a new world would open up for them. Looking at student work needs to be an essential and consistent component of all conversations about school-PLC's, professional development, faculty meetings, RTI meetings, PPT's. A focus on what students are doing as evidenced by their work be it writing, art, a math test, blog, e-portfolio, etc., would allow teachers to discover what is best for each student. Then teachers could turn their attention to the best practice that would lead to each student's growth. 

This need for change in schools motivates me to do what I do as a leader in encouraging and supporting teachers' growth. Joining the #IMMOOC is an opportunity for me to take a risk, grow, learn, and change just as I am asking my teachers to do.